architecture, country house, eyecatcher, garden history, landscape garden, Norfolk, Summerhouse, Temple

The Seat on the Mount, Holkham, Norfolk

In the 1740s William Kent designed a new garden ornament for Thomas Coke of Holkham. An artificial hillock was constructed on which the temple was to stand, giving it the name the Seat on the Mount. The temple was later pulled down, but fragments of the four busts which once decorated it were salvaged, and incorporated into a cottage in a nearby village. The Flâneuse has written about follies built from the remnants of houses, but a cottage decorated with the remnants of a garden temple is something new.

The ‘New Mount’ at Holkham was constructed in 1742, and the Seat on the Mount the following year. The sculptor Peter Scheemakers provided the four figures, two female and two male, that decorate the front elevation. Coke (1697-1759), created Baron Lovell in 1728 and 1st Earl of Leicester in 1744, could visit the seat and from its elevated site he is said to have watched as his new house was constructed.

The Seat on the Mount as illustrated by Matthew Brettingham in The Plans, Elevations and Sections, Of Holkham In Norfolk, The Seat of the late Earl of Leicester. To which are added The Ceilings and Chimney-Pieces; And Also A Descriptive Account of the Statues, Pictures and Drawing.

The architect Matthew Brettingham Senior, who had overseen building work at Holkham, produced a volume of views which included an engraving of the Seat on the Mount. His text tells us that the temple was home to a ‘small antique figure of the Nile’ and a ‘Coro Marino’ (Sea Chorus) of sea nymphs, centaurs and cupids in alto relievo. The figure of the Nile was added to the earl’s collection in 1752, and the bas-relief panel of sea creatures was bought by Coke in Rome in 1716, and was originally part of a sarcophagus. It was noticed by a visitor in 1767 who saw the summerhouse with an ‘ancient Bass-relief in the wall’.

It would seem likely that the Seat on the Mount was taken down when parts of the garden were remodelled in the late eighteenth century. The figure of the Nile had been moved into the house by 1817, and the summerhouse does not appear on nineteenth century Ordnance Survey maps. The art historian Adolf Michaelis complicates matters by mentioning the ‘Seat on the Mount’ in his Ancient Marbles in Great Britain, which was published in 1882. Perhaps he was using outdated information? What is certain is that by 1907 the heads from the Seat on the Mount had been used to embellish a simple cottage in nearby Burnham Overy Town (actually a village, but thus named to distinguish it from Burnham Overy Staithe).

Postcard franked 1907, courtesy of a private collection.

How the figures came to be moved to Burnham Overy Town to decorate the little cottage remains another puzzle, and many passers-by must have wondered about the history of the carved heads.

Jeffrey Whitelaw’s photo of the figures as used by Country Life magazine.

One such curious tourist was the late follyphiliac Jeffrey Whitelaw, and in 1960 he wrote to Country Life magazine asking if anyone knew the origins of the statuary. Whitelaw questioned if the busts were artificial stone from the Pulham factory, but the mystery was solved a couple of weeks later when the Duke of Wellington replied via the magazine’s letters page. The Duke confirmed that the ‘canephoræ’ originally decorated the temple at Holkham. Arthur Wellesley, 7th Duke of Wellington (1885-1972) was an architect, and is of course famed in follydom as the designer of Lord Berners’ tower at Faringdon. Canephoræ are caryatids bearing a basket on their heads that serve as a capital (although strictly speaking canephoræ are female, and two of the figures here are male).

The door surround also appears to be recycled from elsewhere.

In the later years of the twentieth century the fragments were moved to new positions in the tiny front garden, where they remain today. The cottage is now called ‘The Images’ and can easily be seen from the road through the village, and here’s a rather appealing view of it by artist Richard Swallow.

Pen and ink of the cottage by Richard Swallow. Currently with the Bircham Gallery in Holt, Norfolk.

Holkham may have lost the Seat on the Mount, but other fine garden buildings can still be seen including the Obelisk (see the plate above) and the Temple. The latter was built in 1734 after a sketch by William Kent.

The Temple as photographed during torrential rain. The Uncouth Companion thought the very wet walk to see it was ‘above and beyond the call of duty’.

And of course there is the mansion itself and the wonderful collection it holds. The statuette representing the River Nile and the bas-relief panel remain in the family collection (not currently on display), although the latter has fallen apart and is now incomplete.

Holkham on a very damp morning.

Coincidentally (i.e. the Flâneuse is not on commission) the cottage is currently on the market. There’s more here. Everything you need to know about Holkham can be found on their website.

For information on sculpture at Holkham the Flâneuse is indebted to The Holkham Collection of Classical Sculpture by Elizabeth Angelicoussis.

Further information is always very welcome. You can get in touch via the comments box at the foot of the page (only your name will appear – your email address remains private). Thank you for reading.

If you would like a folly story in your inbox each week, click on the subscribe tab to sign up.

 

The Needle’s Eye, Wentworth Woodhouse. Subscribe and discover many other fascinating follies.

Subscribe

Subscribing to The Folly Flaneuse ensures you will never miss a post. All you need to do is provide me with your contact information and you will automatically receive an email each Saturday when I post new content on thefollyflaneuse.com. Your email address will never be sold or shared

 You can remove yourself anytime by contacting me.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

9 thoughts on “The Seat on the Mount, Holkham, Norfolk”

  1. archaeogail says:

    What a fabulous story! How sad that the seat is no more, but how marvellous that the heads survive! Sorry to hear your visit was in such inclement weather and the uncouth companion so underwhelmed by such a fine temple!

    1. Editor says:

      Hello Gail. It is amazing that the heads survived the demolition of the temple. I just hope that there is someone out there who can fill the gaps. I’d love to know how the heads made there way to the little cottage. Alas, the Uncouth Companion once again lived up to his name!

  2. John St B Hooper says:

    Dear Flaneuse, I have known this cottage for so many years and always been intrigued by it. Alas, I have no-one to stay with in Norfolk now but I wish I could afford some £450,000 to buy the property for a hideaway bolt hole. Best wishes, John.

    1. Editor says:

      Good evening John. I suspect you are not alone in coveting the cottage – you would be first on my invitation list were I in a position to buy it and move to Norfolk.

  3. Gwyn says:

    Canephoræ (love the ligature) is a new one on me. Thank you! Educational as ever!

    1. Editor says:

      That, Mr Headley, is what architectural dictionaries are for. It was entirely new to me too.

  4. TOM GARDNER says:

    TOM (NYC)
    TALK ABT. – ‘HAVING A SECOND – LIFE’. ( THE ‘HEADS) AND MULTI -LOCATIONS.
    YET, ‘HOLKHAM’ LOOKS SO …. COSY … ALL 100 + (I IMAGE) – ROOMS.
    … AND ONE WONDERS WHY THERE WAS A FRENCH REVOLUTION?
    REMEMBER, I WAS 4TH FOOTMAN (JR. BUTLER) FOR: MRS. MERRIWEATHER POST @ BOTH: MAR-A-LAGO AND HILLWOOD. (THERE WERE 45 OF US IN STAFF).
    PERHAPS THAT’S WHY I AM SO DRAWN TO YOUR OFFERINGS.
    GRANTED, YOUR EXAMPLES HAVE GREATER AGE, YET OUR EXAMPLES AREN’T
    TOO SHABBY.

    THANKS FOR SHARING,

    TOM

  5. Garance says:

    A fascinating post. With thanks to you for, yet again, braving the weather to get such information to us.

    I don’t blame the UC for thinking the rain was too much. I too would have sat in the car whilst you focussed your camera and tried to keep the lens dry.

    1. Editor says:

      Had you been present, my dear Garance, I feel sure the UC would have happily stayed to chat to you in the warm, dry car whilst I set off on a wet, but productive, walk!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.