<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Skelton Tower, Levisham, North Yorkshire	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thefollyflaneuse.com/skelton-tower-levisham-north-yorkshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thefollyflaneuse.com/skelton-tower-levisham-north-yorkshire/</link>
	<description>Rambles to, and ramblings about, Follies and Garden and Landscape Ornament.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Skelton Tower / Hole Of Horcum Levisham -		</title>
		<link>https://thefollyflaneuse.com/skelton-tower-levisham-north-yorkshire/#comment-12196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skelton Tower / Hole Of Horcum Levisham -]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thefollyflaneuse.com/?p=3158#comment-12196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] woodland. We give it a moderate grading due to the length mostly. Along this walk you will visit Skelton Tower with its fantastic views over the North Yorkshire Railway and if your lucky you may see the steam [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] woodland. We give it a moderate grading due to the length mostly. Along this walk you will visit Skelton Tower with its fantastic views over the North Yorkshire Railway and if your lucky you may see the steam [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Editor		</title>
		<link>https://thefollyflaneuse.com/skelton-tower-levisham-north-yorkshire/#comment-6143</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thefollyflaneuse.com/?p=3158#comment-6143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thefollyflaneuse.com/skelton-tower-levisham-north-yorkshire/#comment-6142&quot;&gt;Peter Brophy&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh dear. You appear to have discovered one of the (many) gaps in my education. I will endeavour to remember the correct form of address for clergymen in future. I applaud your ongoing campaign!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thefollyflaneuse.com/skelton-tower-levisham-north-yorkshire/#comment-6142">Peter Brophy</a>.</p>
<p>Oh dear. You appear to have discovered one of the (many) gaps in my education. I will endeavour to remember the correct form of address for clergymen in future. I applaud your ongoing campaign!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Brophy		</title>
		<link>https://thefollyflaneuse.com/skelton-tower-levisham-north-yorkshire/#comment-6142</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Brophy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thefollyflaneuse.com/?p=3158#comment-6142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The local story is that the Reverend Skelton .....&quot; Oh dear. I think that is still regarded as a solecism in polite society.  Surely it&#039;s &#039;The &#039;Reverend Robert Skelton&#039; or &#039;Mr Skelton&#039;? You wouldn&#039;t, after all, refer to him as &#039;the handsome Skelton&#039; - it would be &#039;the handsome Robert Skelton&#039; .

I know: it&#039;s a lost cause. Though I shall continue inadvertently wincing to myself as I watch almost every TV programme featuring a vicar.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The local story is that the Reverend Skelton &#8230;..&#8221; Oh dear. I think that is still regarded as a solecism in polite society.  Surely it&#8217;s &#8216;The &#8216;Reverend Robert Skelton&#8217; or &#8216;Mr Skelton&#8217;? You wouldn&#8217;t, after all, refer to him as &#8216;the handsome Skelton&#8217; &#8211; it would be &#8216;the handsome Robert Skelton&#8217; .</p>
<p>I know: it&#8217;s a lost cause. Though I shall continue inadvertently wincing to myself as I watch almost every TV programme featuring a vicar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
